Federal Judge Suspends Major Biden Policy in North Dakota Dispute

Judge holding gavel over wooden block.

A federal judge in North Dakota has halted the Biden administration’s rule on natural gas flaring, sparking a legal battle that questions regulatory overreach and economic impact.

At a Glance

  • A federal judge temporarily blocked a Biden administration rule on natural gas flaring at oil wells.
  • Judge Daniel Traynor ruled that the plaintiffs are likely to succeed in their claim that the rule is arbitrary and capricious.
  • North Dakota, along with other states, argued that the rule exceeds regulatory authority and hinders energy production.
  • The Bureau of Land Management claims the rule would reduce gas waste and increase royalties by over $50 million.

Judicial Block on Regulatory Rule

U.S. District Judge Daniel Traynor temporarily blocked a new rule by the Biden administration aimed at reducing the venting and flaring of natural gas at oil wells. According to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the rule was intended to curb waste and could save royalty owners over $50 million. The halt came following a legal challenge by North Dakota and other states who argued that the rule oversteps federal regulatory authority.

Judge Traynor indicated that the plaintiffs will likely prevail in their claims that the 2024 rule is arbitrary and imposes excessive regulations. North Dakota politicians praised the ruling, emphasizing that the rule added unnecessary federal oversight that impinges on the state’s ability to manage its energy production.

States’ Case Against Federal Regulations

North Dakota, Montana, Texas, Wyoming, and Utah filed the lawsuit against the BLM rule, claiming that it would significantly hinder oil and gas production in these states. They argued that the rule imposes an unnecessary regulatory burden and conflicts with state and other federal laws. The lawsuit suggested that the rule exceeded BLM’s authority, unlawfully regulating air emissions and state/private mineral interests.

“This case is an example of where the left hand of the government does not know what the right hand of the government is doing,” Judge Daniel Traynor remarked.

The rule aimed to limit flaring and venting of natural gas, processes which are often used because capturing the gas requires costly equipment. Methane, the main component of natural gas, is a potent climate pollutant. Despite improvements, flaring rates in North Dakota still hover around 5%.

Competing Views on Environmental Regulation

The BLM has argued that their rule was focused on reducing methane emissions and ensuring that oil companies pay royalties for wasted methane. Judge Traynor, however, contended that the benefits of the BLM rule do not outweigh its regulatory costs. The judge remarked that maintaining the status quo during litigation would not harm the BLM and would give courts time to resolve these concerns definitively.

“They conflict with other federal and state laws,” Judge Traynor wrote, “and they add nothing more than a layer of federal regulation on top of existing federal regulation.”

The rule has been criticized by local politicians who view it as part of a broader strategy by the Biden administration to overregulate the energy industry. Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon termed the decision to halt the rule a positive step against what he views as debilitating federal policies.

Future Implications

The ongoing litigation will determine whether the BLM’s rule will withstand judicial scrutiny. Traynor’s ruling has significant implications for states’ rights and federal regulatory power, as the court must balance environmental concerns against economic impacts on energy production. The Bureau of Land Management and the Biden administration have defended the rule as a necessary step to mitigate environmental harm and ensure fair returns to taxpayers.

“The Biden-Harris administration continuously attempts to overregulate and ultimately debilitate North Dakota’s energy production capabilities,” Attorney General Drew Wrigley stated.

As the judicial process unfolds, stakeholders on both sides will continue to watch closely. The outcome could set a precedent for future regulatory actions aimed at curbing emissions while balancing the interests of local economies and state sovereignties.

Sources:

  1. Federal judge temporarily blocks Biden administration rule to limit flaring of gas at oil wells
  2. Judge blocks Interior methane rule in five states
  3. Federal Judge Blocks Biden’s New Rule on Gas Flaring at Oil Wells

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR