Democrats Silent for Murder Victims

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt delivered a scathing rebuke of congressional Democrats, systematically listing their refusal to applaud American crime victims, a brain cancer patient, and tax relief for working families during President Trump’s address to Congress.

Story Snapshot

Democrats refused to applaud victims of illegal immigrant crimes, a volleyball player injured by a transgender athlete, and a 13-year-old brain cancer patient during Trump’s congressional address
Leavitt called Democrats’ behavior the “most shameful moment in the history of presidential addresses” after they only applauded Ukraine-related mentions
Trump’s speech received 76% approval in CBS/YouGov polling, reaching historic highs as Democrats booed, walked out, and held up “False” protest paddles
Congressional Democrats wore Ukraine solidarity colors and disrupted the address while Speaker Mike Johnson repeatedly attempted to restore order

Democrats Reject American Victims and Achievements

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt methodically cataloged Democrats’ refusal to acknowledge key moments during Trump’s address to Congress. Democrats remained seated and silent when the President honored families of daughters murdered by illegal immigrants, recognized a female volleyball player with a traumatic brain injury caused by a transgender athlete, and acknowledged a 13-year-old boy battling brain cancer. Democrats also withheld applause for Trump’s proposals to eliminate taxes on tips and Social Security benefits, policies directly benefiting millions of working Americans.

Ukraine Over America: Democrats’ Sole Standing Ovation

The stark contrast emerged when Democrats enthusiastically applauded mentions of Ukraine aid, jumping to their feet while remaining unmoved by American tragedies and achievements. Leavitt characterized this as exposing Democrats as “the party of insanity and hate” that “put America last.” Washington insider Armstrong Williams, who witnessed the address, described Democrats’ behavior as “sickening” and “embarrassing for our democracy,” noting their visible resentment and anger throughout Trump’s speech. Many Democrats arrived wearing yellow and blue attire signaling Ukraine support.

Chamber Chaos and Partisan Disruption

Congressional Democrats orchestrated multiple disruptions during the address, including booing policy announcements, holding up protest paddles reading “False” and “Musk Steals,” and staging walkouts. Speaker Mike Johnson repeatedly attempted to restore decorum in the House chamber, but Democrats ignored his efforts. Williams noted that Johnson gave multiple opportunities for calm behavior, all of which Democrats rejected. The disruptions echoed similar protests during Trump’s previous congressional addresses, establishing a pattern of resistance to America-first policies on immigration enforcement, border security, and protecting women’s sports from transgender participation.

Public Approval Contradicts Democratic Resistance

Leavitt cited CBS/YouGov polling showing 76% approval for Trump’s address, with Daily Mail reporting historic highs in public support. The polling data underscores a disconnect between Democratic lawmakers and American voters, who overwhelmingly endorsed Trump’s focus on domestic priorities. Leavitt characterized Democrats as “out of touch” for prioritizing foreign interests over American families affected by illegal immigration, rising costs, and threats to women’s safety in sports. The briefing, which started 30 minutes late after Leavitt consulted with President Trump, aimed to ensure Americans remember Democrats’ behavior when evaluating their elected representatives’ priorities.

This incident reinforces growing concerns among conservatives that Democrats have abandoned core American values in favor of globalist agendas and resistance politics. When lawmakers refuse to honor crime victims and sick children while celebrating foreign aid, they reveal priorities fundamentally opposed to putting America first. The contrast between public approval and Democratic hostility suggests voters recognize the difference between policies strengthening families and borders versus those undermining national sovereignty and women’s rights.