State Governors Aim for More Control in Immigration to Revitalize Economies

Gavel on immigration law book in library

Two governors are proposing a significant shift in immigration policy that could redefine economic landscapes in their respective states, but the federal government holds the final decision.

Key Takeaways

Governors Jared Polis and Kevin Stitt propose state-level control over immigration policies to boost local economies.
They seek presidential approval to allow states to issue work permits to undocumented immigrants.
The goal is to address labor shortages and improve integration of immigrants into the workforce.
Concerns exist over potential competition among states, affecting wages and housing costs.

Governors Advocate for State-level Immigration Authority

At a recent National Governors Association meeting, Colorado’s Democratic Governor Jared Polis and Oklahoma’s Republican Governor Kevin Stitt unveiled a bipartisan proposal, urging states to have a more active role in immigration policy decisions. They have formally requested that President Trump empowers states to issue work permits to undocumented immigrants, a jurisdiction traditionally managed by the federal government. Their argument stems from the need to enrich local economies by fulfilling labor demands with immigrant workers.

During the meeting, Polis emphasized, “We want to make sure we’re at the table in that with regard to immigration.” He suggests that states could issue work permits following thorough background checks, thereby encouraging economic growth. Governor Stitt aligns with the concept, advocating for workforce visas administered by states to match employers and employees effectively.

Potential Economic Impact and Challenges

Polis views this potential shift as a means to bolster economic expansion by integrating immigrants more effectively into the workforce. Stitt echoed these sentiments, seeing the proposal as an opportunity to “create opportunities” and fill employment gaps in Oklahoma. However, not all responses to the proposal have been favorable. Critics, including Oklahoma Superintendent Ryan Walters, argue that such a policy might undermine President Trump’s America First stance.

Concerns have been raised about potential negative repercussions, including inter-state competition to attract low-wage workers, which could drive down wages and hike housing costs for American residents. Despite these challenges, Polis and Stitt remain steadfast in their belief that with the right balance of state control, immigration can be a catalyst for economic vitality.

Balancing Federal and State Interests

Both governors stress the necessity of cooperation between federal and state authorities. Although Polis’ state of Colorado has sanctuary-style laws, he underscores the importance of collaboration to enhance the existing framework. Stitt has also initiated efforts such as Operation Guardian, aimed at deporting criminal illegal aliens in cooperation with federal enforcers, reflecting a nuanced approach to immigration policies.

This proposal potentially marks a new chapter in how states handle immigration, setting a precedent that could influence future policy. As Governors Polis and Stitt continue to negotiate with federal powers, the outcome may well shape not only local economies but also national immigration strategy.